Talk:Babbage problem: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
m (→task clarification: fixed a closing HTML tag (BIG).) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
And, in the hinterlands of the Rosetta Code coders, it was heard: |
And, in the hinterlands of the Rosetta Code coders, it was heard: |
||
<big>Oh yeah? ''my'' googolplex thingy is bigger than ''your'' googolplex thingy. So there!<big> |
<big>Oh yeah? ''my'' googolplex thingy is bigger than ''your'' googolplex thingy. So there!</big> |
||
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC) |
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:10, 13 April 2016
task clarification
I can only assume that a positive integer is meant to be found, otherwise finding the smallest negative integer would be pointless.
How about:
-99,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,025,264
(Of course, there are smaller numbers!)
And, in the hinterlands of the Rosetta Code coders, it was heard:
Oh yeah? my googolplex thingy is bigger than your googolplex thingy. So there!
-- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)