Talk:Approximate equality: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→Can of worms: sp.) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Can of worms== |
==Can of worms== |
||
uh-oh, you've opened a can of words here. I can remember in the far distant |
uh-oh, you've opened a can of words here. I can remember in the far distant past, being lectured to about floating point/equality/closeness and I resolved to run and hide if I could in the future :-)<br> |
||
Firstly, you can't leave people to find out how Python does it, if you want them to use a specific method then you need to add the description to the task.<br> |
Firstly, you can't leave people to find out how Python does it, if you want them to use a specific method then you need to add the description to the task.<br> |
||
Second. Approximation depends on circumstances. If the compared vary exponentially ar non-linearly, or ... then one may end up with different, but more usable definitions of approximately equal.<br> |
Second. Approximation depends on circumstances. If the compared vary exponentially ar non-linearly, or ... then one may end up with different, but more usable definitions of approximately equal.<br> |
Revision as of 15:18, 2 September 2019
Can of worms
uh-oh, you've opened a can of words here. I can remember in the far distant past, being lectured to about floating point/equality/closeness and I resolved to run and hide if I could in the future :-)
Firstly, you can't leave people to find out how Python does it, if you want them to use a specific method then you need to add the description to the task.
Second. Approximation depends on circumstances. If the compared vary exponentially ar non-linearly, or ... then one may end up with different, but more usable definitions of approximately equal.
--Paddy3118 (talk) 12:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)