Anonymous user
Talk:Arithmetic evaluation: Difference between revisions
→Autohotkey example being solely a link offsite
m (moved Talk:Arithmetic Evaluator to Talk:Arithmetic evaluation) |
|||
Line 22:
== Why AST is required? ==
Why AST generation is put into the requirement? Clearly arithmetic expression interpretation with predefined types does not need AST. In fact, it is just wasting resources to use AST for that. So if AST is essential, then the task should rather be named like, parsing infix expression in order to generate AST. I.e. the output must be the AST, not the expression value. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 19:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
==Autohotkey example being solely a link offsite==
It is not ideal. Should it be allowed?
If left to a vote I would vote that either someone acquired the permissions to post the code here under a compatible license or it was left out. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 17:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
| |||