Talk:N-queens minimum and knights and bishops: Difference between revisions
Talk:N-queens minimum and knights and bishops (view source)
Revision as of 00:39, 13 May 2022
, 2 years ago→Simple solution for bishops: Yes, it is worth it.
(→Simple solution for bishops: Thanks to Pete!) |
(→Simple solution for bishops: Yes, it is worth it.) |
||
Line 107:
::::Do you think it's worth even bothering with bishops when we know from general reasoning that the answer will be 'n' for an 'n x n' board and its trivial to construct an example?
:::::Well, yeah, of course it is, though I'll grant you not very exciting. Simply only ever place bishops in the middle column, either by testing for that or even better yet changing the column loop. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 00:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
::::Incidentally, I'm working on a GLPK wrapper for Wren as I'd like to have something in the LP/MIP solver area which can at least solve 'small' problems relatively quickly. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 17:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
| |||