Talk:Tokenize a string with escaping: Difference between revisions
Talk:Tokenize a string with escaping (view source)
Revision as of 09:54, 12 January 2017
, 7 years ago→The alternative Haskell solution needs attention
Line 14:
: I have itemized solutions and added conduit-based solution. However, I don't see the reason to leave the inefficient and non-idiomatic variant. --[[User:Samsergey|Samsergey]] ([[User talk:Samsergey|talk]]) 03:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
: Thanks, your point about efficiency at scale is interesting and well taken. This task doesn't specify performance at scale, and I think it can be useful to also show the 'simplest' (or most naive :-) single fold solution, but I appreciate your having documented the issue. Very happy to remove for the moment and experiment. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 09:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
| |||