Anonymous user
Talk:Sorting algorithms/Cycle sort: Difference between revisions
m
→number of writes: "struck-out" my bumbling questions.
m (→4 REXXen: added some comments (even comments about comments).) |
m (→number of writes: "struck-out" my bumbling questions.) |
||
Line 1:
==number of ''writes''==
<strike>
Am I missing something or is the sample algorithm (on the Wiki article '''Cycle sort''') incorrect in regards to the number of ''item writes'' (when placing items in the array)?
Line 6 ⟶ 7:
I only mention it as it appears one of the benefits of a ''cycle sort'' is the low number of writes being used during the cycle sort process. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:35, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
</strike>
-----
Nevermind, I see the algorithm was only counting writes to the original array. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
==4 REXXen==
| |||