Talk:Hash join: Difference between revisions
→Is identity a hash?: new section
m (→clarification needed: added closing parenthesis. -- ~~~~) |
(→Is identity a hash?: new section) |
||
Line 10:
Can the nemeses (plural) be listed on one line (as the REXX example shows)? To me, it looks cleaner, more succint, less screen (output) clutter. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
== Is identity a hash? ==
If the easiest way of implementing this is to use the identity function as the hash function, would that qualify? Why or why not? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 04:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
| |||