User talk:Siskus: Difference between revisions
→marking REXX entries as novice: 2nd thoughts
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→marking REXX entries as novice: üöease ANSWER, dont argue unrelatedly!) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→marking REXX entries as novice: 2nd thoughts) |
||
Line 142:
:: It seems to me that the author of the task is not "hindered by any knowledge". For as I know, REXX has NO garbage collector. Take also in account that the writer makes ill-formed metadata (causing problems on other browsers then MS Internet Explorer) without knowing the difference between a breaking and non-breaking space (as shown in the <code>_<space></code> and several double space), then the contributor must be a novice.
It also not '''fair''' that missing functionality is called
:: Could you please answer my question?--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 18:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
::: looking at the task's description it seems to me that Scala is not really addressing it and neither is REXX. Anyway, calling a Rexx expert "novice" is an inappropriate insult. We all try to teach and learn and avoid calling colleagues names. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 18:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
| |||