Anonymous user
Category talk:Racket: Difference between revisions
→racket IS scheme
Line 11:
::: Racket's documentation, at [http://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/dialects.html Dialects of Racket and Scheme], claims that Racket and R6RS are different dialects: "beware that the syntactic forms and functions of R6RS differ from Racket."
:::: it also says that racket is based on the scheme branch of lisp, meaning that racket is a dialect of scheme. the same claim is made by other scheme implementations.--[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 06:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
::::: [http://racket-lang.org/new-name.html] has more details about the relationship between racket and scheme.--[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 06:38, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
::: Among the contributors to Rosetta Code, the authors of Racket and Scheme examples should decide whether Racket is Scheme, or Racket is a separate language. A page like [[24 game]] should not have a Racket section and also, at the same time, have "PLT Scheme" in its Scheme section.
| |||