Anonymous user
Talk:Pascal's triangle/Puzzle: Difference between revisions
→The Go rant: new section
(→Is this cheating?: 100 doors?) |
(→The Go rant: new section) |
||
Line 6:
Is it ok to work out intermediate equations yourself and input those instead of the pyramid? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 21:28, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
: See rationalization of [[100 doors]]? --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 21:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
== The Go rant ==
The first Go solution lists a blank program after much protesting, saying that this problem is easily solved by hand thus not worth programming for. It ignored the fact that a human with a pencil and stack of paper is (more than) Turing complete, thus by the same logic nothing is ever worthy of a program. I think it's really uncalled for. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 06:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||