Jump to content

Talk:Reduced row echelon form: Difference between revisions

Line 124:
:: I haven't looked into it in detail, but adding an "if (div != 0)" line before the offending division seems to make it behave reasonably.
::
:: edit: looking into it, the lead-- line seems to deviate from the original algorithm, replacing that with a "return Matrixmatrix;" seems to fix it.
Anonymous user
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.