Page history
Talk:Y combinator
15 October 2018
13 October 2018
11 October 2018
GordonBGood
→Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit: response after reversion...
+1,051
Hout
→Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit
+120
10 October 2018
Hout
→Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit
+216
GordonBGood
→Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit: response...
+2,741
Hout
→Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit
+1
Hout
→Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit
+559
11 July 2016
GordonBGood
→Comment on the overall task: minor correction
m+91
GordonBGood
→Comment on the overall task: edited, responded...
+1,207
10 July 2016
Rdm
→Comment on the overall task
m+230
Rdm
→Comment on the overall task
m+13
Rdm
→Comment on the overall task
+430
GordonBGood
Added comment on the Task...
+6,198
26 May 2015
30 May 2011
11 April 2011
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→PicoLisp not incorrect: Sorry.
+105
rosettacode>Kernigh
→PicoLisp not incorrect: Someone else removed it from the E example.
m−24
rosettacode>Kernigh
→PicoLisp not incorrect: new section
+562
rosettacode>Kernigh
→Is this really the "Y" combinator?: Ruby has not the Y combinator.
+2,518
10 April 2011
21 November 2010
93.144.202.116
→"Y" combinator in Scheme
+235
93.144.202.116
→"Y" combinator in Scheme
+159
93.144.202.116
no edit summary
+425
12 September 2010
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Perl 6 comment on the need for Y?: Ta!
+70
rosettacode>TimToady
→Perl 6 comment on the need for Y?
+398
11 September 2010
30 November 2009
5 June 2009
20 May 2009
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Could We remove the recursive examples!
+446
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→Could We remove the recursive examples!
+231
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Could We remove the recursive examples!
+273
28 March 2009
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Could We remove the recursive examples!
m+17
rosettacode>Paddy3118
Could We remove the recursive examples
+147
2 March 2009
1 March 2009
28 February 2009
140.180.177.122
→Haskell stateless?
+1,686
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Haskell stateless?: Recursive types?
+197
rosettacode>Spoon!
no edit summary
+246
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Haskell stateless?
+159
rosettacode>Paddy3118
New page: ==Haskell stateless?== I don't know Haskell, but isn't the definition: y f = f (y f) '''not''' stateless as it seems to be defining y by referring to y. Haskell, no doubt has lazy evalua...
+345