Page history
29 November 2019
20 July 2016
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added a talk section header so that the TOC (table of contents) appears at the correct location.
m+30
rosettacode>Guardons
no edit summary
+488
20 April 2013
14 July 2012
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Spec?: added ''style'' to ''Attic'' and explained (somewhat) the Attic style.
+277
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Spec?: expanded comments on various Roman numeral options. -- ~~~~
+371
26 April 2012
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: correct my own typo
mrosettacode>Dkf
→Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: Font dependent
+326
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: Go for it
+302
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added whitespace.
m+5
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added comment about error checking.
m+260
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added a comment about the wording/meaning of a "requirement".
m+164
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: added comment about not being able to view those characters.
m+145
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Spec?: added comments concerning what choices there are.
m+535
30 November 2011
9 May 2011
rosettacode>Mwn3d
moved Talk:Roman numerals to Talk:Roman numerals/Encode: Differentiate it from the Decode version
mrosettacode>Mwn3d
→Parsing roman numerals: Cool...thanks for seeing that typo
+156
rosettacode>Mikachu
added it
+114
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Parsing roman numerals
+217
MikeMol
→Parsing roman numerals: Go ahead and create it?
+196
194.14.173.209
parsing?
+80
30 July 2010
6 February 2010
1 April 2008
rosettacode>Dirkt
no edit summary
+568
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Spec?: Sounds good but more info is needed
+72
rosettacode>IanOsgood
New section: Spec?
+191
rosettacode>Mwn3d
Fixed negative numbers condition in Java
+57
rosettacode>Mwn3d
New section: 400
+161
rosettacode>Waldorf
New page: The Java example does not enforce the requirement that the parameter for the conversion function must be a positive integer. Enforcement of such a requirement should result in an error con...
+351