Page history
Talk:Quaternion type
22 September 2016
11 August 2014
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→=Julia outdated w.r.t. imag?: Whoops.
m+1
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural): Julia outdated w.r.t. imag?
+352
10 August 2014
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural): Julia has an update...
+50
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural): Moved...
+161
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural): (sign)
m+90
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural): Julia library writers.
+116
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural): Que?
+324
Peak
→Imaginary parts (plural)
−4
Peak
→Imaginary parts (plural)
+1,356
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural): how would imag be used?
m−3
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural): how would imagine be used?
+449
Rdm
grammar
m+5
Rdm
→Imaginary parts (plural)
+634
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Imaginary parts (plural)
+278
28 October 2013
rosettacode>Arbautjc
→Why is it so complicated?
+115
rosettacode>Arbautjc
→Why is it so complicated?
+139
2 May 2013
Rdm
→Why is it so complicated?
m+22
Rdm
→Why is it so complicated?
+1,291
Grondilu
new section: why so complicated?
+832
15 July 2012
8 May 2011
10 March 2011
3 February 2011
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Name: Move it? Of course.
+123
rosettacode>Paddy3118
moved Talk:Simple quaternion type and operations to Talk:Quaternion type: More focused/less verbose title.
mrosettacode>Kevin Reid
→Name: new section
+213
1 December 2010
6 August 2010
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→ADA Issue?: Ta!
+78
rosettacode>Dmitry-kazakov
→ADA Issue?: Fixed
+134
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→ADA Issue?: And the same applies to Algol 68
+92
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→ADA Issue?
+258
4 August 2010
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→What simple properties should become part of the task?: Rotation psuedocode
+208
rosettacode>Dkf
→What simple properties should become part of the task?: What about rotations?
+245
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→What simple properties should become part of the task?: With '''compl'''[ex] numbers such a test could be to check that exp(πi)=-1. Is there an equivalent for Quaternions?
m+631
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→What simple properties should become part of the task?
+311
Rdm
Basically: yes
+435
3 August 2010
MikeMol
→Why a draft project?: I like the task.
+369
MikeMol
→Why a draft project?: Ah.
+558
Rdm
no edit summary
m+12
Rdm
no edit summary
m+18
Rdm
quaternions are not so general
+1,271
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→Why a draft project?
m+717
MikeMol
→Why a draft project?: What I was thinking
+358
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Why a draft project?
+344
MikeMol
Sounds interesting to me.
+451
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→hy a draft project?
+300