Page history
Talk:Practical numbers
2 April 2021
Rdm
→Rosettacode's purpose
m+107
Rdm
→Rosettacode's purpose: new section
+306
Hout
→We already know you disagree with my approach, but how do we move on ?
+1,280
Hout
→Acceptable Solutions ?: Comments written in English ?
+109
Petelomax
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy): name
m+7
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Two of many examples of using Haskell in Python.
+1,578
Hout
→Acceptable Solutions ?
+30
Hout
→Acceptable Solutions ?
+10
Hout
→Acceptable Solutions ?
+4
Hout
→Acceptable Solutions ?
+9
Hout
→==Acceptable Solutions ?==
+2,120
1 April 2021
Petelomax
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy): sp
mHout
Divergent approaches are a form of '''wealth''' for Rosetta Code, not a source of threat.
+1,106
Hout
→One of many examples of using Haskell in Python.
−3
Hout
→One of many examples of using Haskell in Python.
+3,214
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→One of many examples of using Haskell in Python
+1,515
Hout
→Enough to dissuade these interventions ?
+1,495
Wherrera
no edit summary
m+576
Hout
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy)
+120
Petelomax
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy)
mPetelomax
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy)
+129
Petelomax
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy)
m+1
Petelomax
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy)
+700
Hout
→Disagreement is not a problem for Rosetta Code – it's an opportunity for additional parallel variants.
+666
Hout
→Oh dear ... what is this addiction to angry vandalism ?
+68
Hout
→Oh dear ... what is this addiction to angry vandalism ?
+378
Hout
The comments could be written in English ... but the animus would, as in the past, then elect some other focus.
+28
Hout
→Haskell type hints are not valid Python
+491
Nigel Galloway
→Create a new language code (my awkward attempt at a bit of diplomacy)
+318
Nigel Galloway
→Haskell type hints are not valid Python
+5
Nigel Galloway
→Haskell type hints are not valid Python
+1,488
Hout
We come here to share and learn, and think.
+1,988
Hout
→Optimising for different things
m+1,693
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Haskell type hints are not valid Python: Haskell isn't Python.
+379
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→*Kick*: Language,
+461
Hout
→you've debugged them all – wonderful !!
+200
Hout
→Good ! You've debugged that that type hint – Thanks !!
+831
Hout
→*Kick*
+1,241
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Haskell type hints are not valid Python: Your Haskell is fine for Haskell - Python does typing differently.
+797
31 March 2021
Hout
→Haskell type hints are not valid Python
+8
Hout
→Haskell type hints are not valid Python
+345
Hout
→Haskell type hints are not valid Python
+22
Hout
Would you prefer that I write my type comments in English ?
+1,843
Hout
→disgraceful attack on the health and wealth of Rosetta Code, and on the principles of PEP8
+4,100
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Python: Comment on type hints for the functional example: Dishonest dealings of Hout.
+666
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Oh dear ... what is this addiction to angry vandalism ?: Haskell typing does not belong in so many Python examples.
+477
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→*Kick*: Caught in your lie.
+512
Hout
→Oh dear ... what is this addiction to angry vandalism ?
+2
Hout
→Oh dear ... what is this addiction to angry vandalism ?
m+1
Hout
→Oh dear ... what is this addiction to angry vandalism ?
+730