Page history
14 June 2011
rosettacode>Sluggo
→Suggested changes to the task description
m+131
rosettacode>Sluggo
added suggestions
+1,139
21 April 2011
rosettacode>Kernigh
→Is Scala correct?: Yes, you can pass arity 3 function to map.
+451
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→What is partial application?: new section
+733
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Is Scala correct?: re
+456
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Is Scala correct?: Fixed?
+338
rosettacode>Kernigh
→Is Scala correct?: It fails the task requirement that "other parameters are not explicitely mentioned".
+532
20 April 2011
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Current task description is a bit odd: re
+211
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Current task description is a bit odd: re
+623
Rdm
→Current task description is a bit odd
+205
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Current task description is a bit odd: P.A. or not P.A?
+369
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Current task description is a bit odd: suggested task description
+16
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: suggested task description
+710
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Is Scala correct?: Could be?
+344
rosettacode>Kernigh
→Is Scala correct?: The _ seems to be a "partial application underscore".
+496
17 April 2011
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: Current task description is a bit odd
+846
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: move re
m+1
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: re
+747
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Is D correct?: comment
+326
16 April 2011
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Is D correct?: F needs to be a function.
+323
95.250.47.173
More D comment
+148
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Is D correct?: Edited .
+312
Sonia
→Is D correct?: strict vs. liberal
+1,076
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Proposal for new task description: more explanation of my POV.
+845
rosettacode>Kernigh
→Proposal for new task description: With Ruby, curry f2.
+346
15 April 2011
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: re
+820
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Is D correct?: Make plain that D doesn't have it.
+721
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Proposal for new task description: I'd prefer separation.
+352
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: ruby 1.9
+18
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: typo
mrosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: ruby 1.9
+36
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: ruby 1.9
+322
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: sign
m+63
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: ''f'' -> ''g''
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: (non-)idiomatic
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: (non-)idiomatic
+66
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description
+477
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description
−18
rosettacode>Ruud Koot
→Proposal for new task description: new section
+1,195
80.180.167.140
→Is D correct?
+107
80.180.167.140
D solution comment added
+267
rosettacode>Kernigh
→Explicit curry vs Partial application: An attempt to compare Java, Haskell.
+2,627
Sonia
→Is Lisp correct?: yes vote
+254
rosettacode>Kernigh
→Is Lisp correct?: It uses &rest to accept a variable number of arguments.
+642
14 April 2011
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Is Lisp correct?
+615
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Is Scala correct?
+628
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Explicit curry vs Partial application: Java not partial application.
+486
rosettacode>Kernigh
The update is OK with me. Java solution.
+1,181
13 April 2011
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Explicit curry vs Partial application: Anyone else up for it?
+210
Sonia
ok, so
+969