Page history
Talk:Multisplit
23 July 2022
Rdm
Discard verbose description -- no one found it useful, and implementation has been replaced
−8,952
30 December 2011
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Desired output: missing qts
m+2
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Desired output: it could have been clearer but ....
+1,319
29 December 2011
21 July 2011
6 July 2011
rosettacode>Dgamey
→No longer draft
+149
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→No longer draft: Are you sure?
+176
rosettacode>Mwn3d
Move new topic to an easier to find place
m−2
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Small inaccuracy in the smaller non-RE Python version?
+126
5 July 2011
9 June 2011
rosettacode>Dgamey
→F# incorrect
+559
rosettacode>Markhobley
I do not understand the expected results
+546
27 April 2011
26 April 2011
rosettacode>TimToady
→What is going on here?
+837
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Clarification in order: fix note
m+152
Rdm
→What is going on here?
+349
rosettacode>TimToady
→What is going on here?
+183
MikeMol
Changed protection level for "Talk:Multisplit" ([edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 14:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 14:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)))
mMikeMol
Protected "Talk:Multisplit": Counter-productive edit warring ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite))
mMikeMol
→Clarification in order: On the ban.
+662
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Clarification in order
+153
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Clarification in order: Seconded.
+199
93.79.132.29
→Clarification in order
+475
Rdm
→Correct result
+570
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Clarification in order: discussion on correct result
+1,164
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Clarification in order: Swearing/Helping.
+1,069
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Clarification in order: response to vincent
+430
Vincent
→Clarification in order
+536
24 April 2011
22 April 2011
MikeMol
→Clarification in order: Responses
+602
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Correct result: discussion with Vincent
+1,614
Vincent
→Clarification in order
+380
21 April 2011
rosettacode>Dgamey
clarification needed in task and mandatory output
+1,194
Rdm
→F# incorrect
+47
Rdm
The algorithm
+550
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→F# incorrect: I guess that's why it's still a draft
+404
Rdm
F# correct
+518
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→F# incorrect: new section
+693
Vincent
→Correct result
+251
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Correct result: Order is important
+516
Vincent
→Correct result
m+60
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Small inaccuracy in the smaller non-RE Python version?
+421
1 March 2011
28 February 2011
Rdm
→while. loop
mRdm
→implementation
m+17
Rdm
→J implementation: new section
+8,239
rosettacode>DSblizzard
no edit summary
+66