Page history
Talk:Kaprekar numbers
24 October 2020
27 October 2012
26 October 2012
rosettacode>Ledrug
Undo revision 146134: Nigel Galloway, stop deleting a large chunk of talk page just because you don't like it, be reasonable.
+31,209
Nigel Galloway
→Common Lisp Implementation
−31,209
24 October 2012
rosettacode>Ledrug
Undo revision 146030 by Nigel Galloway (talk) restore the discussion
+31,209
Nigel Galloway
→Common Lisp Implementation
−31,209
16 October 2012
13 October 2012
11 October 2012
10 October 2012
9 October 2012
Nigel Galloway
→Conflict Resolution?
+1,041
Nigel Galloway
→Testing Common Lisp Contributions
+1,060
Nigel Galloway
→Issue the third
+3
Nigel Galloway
→Testing Common Lisp Contributions
+2
Nigel Galloway
→Testing Common Lisp Contributions
−5
8 October 2012
Nigel Galloway
→Issue the second
+3
Nigel Galloway
→Issue the second
+1,581
rosettacode>Lhignight
→Conflict Resolution?: Compilation testing of Common Lisp versions
+1,240
rosettacode>Lhignight
→Conflict Resolution?: Responded to Paddy's resolution suggestion and more of Nigel's inaccuracies / nonsense
+4,412
7 October 2012
5 October 2012
4 October 2012
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Common Lisp Implementation #Conflict Resolution?
+802
Nigel Galloway
→Common Lisp Implementation
+1,901
rosettacode>Lhignight
no edit summary
+366
rosettacode>Ledrug
→Common Lisp Implementation
+2,613
1 October 2012
30 September 2012
26 September 2012
23 September 2012
21 September 2012
19 September 2012
Nigel Galloway
→Common Lisp Implementation
+582
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Common Lisp Implementation: Speed.
+429
18 September 2012
29 June 2012
7 May 2012
21 March 2012
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added comments about definition of a "whole number", "natural number", "counting number". -- ~~~~
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added comments about definition of a "whole number", "natural number", "counting number". -- ~~~~
+547
30 August 2011
MikeMol
→We've been linked to from a prestigious source: sweet
+74
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→We've been linked to from a prestigious source: Other mentions around Kaprekar variant sequences in OEIS.
+264
29 August 2011
rosettacode>Mwn3d
Undo revision 119073 by NevilleDNZ (talk)He wanted the Google cache link (for the highlight)
+152
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→We've been linked to from a prestigious source: sequence link: https://oeis.org/A006886 (link was google cache)
m−152
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→We've been linked to from a prestigious source
+418
8 August 2011
27 June 2011
26 June 2011
rosettacode>Ledrug
→In base B 10: why printing?
+555
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→In base B 10: Huh?
+106
Toucan
→In base B 10: new section
+311