Page history
18 February 2018
18 September 2017
19 September 2014
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): Quote hassle
m−3
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): asteism is indeed the correct word. I was misled by Google
+296
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): asterism
m+194
18 September 2014
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Arbitration?: GIYF and asteisms.
m+533
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Vote: Walter 1, Gerard 0: comment crusades.
m+3,375
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: peace please!
+808
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Arbitration?: left-handed compliment comment.
m+925
Rvjansen
→Vote: Walter 1, Gerard 0: new section
+1,984
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: an example for constructive action instead of the current infight.
+416
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: add TRL1 to the sost of specifications.
m+5
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: Please define Classic Rexx
+600
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Arbitration?: about defining Classic REXX and other comments.
m+4,317
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: Classic REXX Interpreter is an undefinable notion!
+1,112
17 September 2014
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Arbitration?: answered the "or what" question.
m+623
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: typo
m+1
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: WHAT should be decided in lieu of voted?
+345
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Arbitration?: added a P.S.
m+292
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Arbitration?: added invitational comments.
m+9,899
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: corrected a MAJOR error in my 48 words and still waiting for the first vote :-(
+1
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: 48 words
+400
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Arbitration?: Emphasis.
+6
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): typo and formatting
m+3
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): I consider Version 2 better than Version 1
+523
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: typo
m+34
Walterpachl
→Arbitration?: please tell me if and where I am wrong
+1,775
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a comment about o-o languages.
m+760
16 September 2014
15 September 2014
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: answered another query.
m+675
Walterpachl
→entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: WHAT is an ooRexx language entry?
+546
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): 2 more answers
+514
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): "does", "do" ... replaced a word.
m+22
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: answering an obvious query.
m+544
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments for clarification.
m+834
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): explain few and perfect
+1,224
Walterpachl
→entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: which?
+214
14 September 2014
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments about not accepting false facts consistently.
+9,146
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): what should go into the REXX language section?!
+1,062
13 September 2014
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): explaining idiom.
m+495
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): results for Classic REXX interpretors.
m+1,539
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): formatting and typo
m−1
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): retort to retort to ...
+588
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a rebuttal.
+909
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): What is the REXX section for? LANGUAGE or IMPLEMENTATION?
+352
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): for,atting
m−1
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added another comment.
m+382
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a new talk section.
+1,598
Walterpachl
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): I understood what you did bit don' agree.
+293
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added a comment.
m+284