Page history
1 February 2014
12 June 2012
rosettacode>Dkf
→Assumption - host word size: Log_2 is easy and cheap (log_10, not)
+695
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→More Clarification "set bit": my understanding of someone else's understanding of their understanding of my understanding. -- ~~~~
m+134
9 May 2012
8 May 2012
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→More Clarification "set bit": added comment about validity of defining how REXX stores integers. -- ~~~~
+778
Rdm
→More Clarification "set bit"
+280
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→More Clarification "set bit": added comment about integers stored in "binary" form. -- ~~~~
+2,009
Rdm
→More Clarification "set bit"
+615
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added comment about numbers not being stored in binary . -- ~~~~
+702
9 December 2011
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Assumption - host word size: indeed
+361
rosettacode>Ledrug
→Assumption - host word size
+1,753
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Assumption - host word size: next natural long is also an assumption
m+54
rosettacode>Dgamey
Assumption - host word size
+379
rosettacode>Dgamey
→More Clarification "set bit": ok
m+94
rosettacode>Ledrug
→More Clarification "set bit"
+291
rosettacode>Dgamey
→More Clarification "set bit": incorrect algol?
m+98
rosettacode>Ledrug
→More Clarification "set bit"
+488
rosettacode>Dgamey
→More Clarification "set bit": what set means
m+315
rosettacode>Dkf
→Errors: Talk about the numeric model of Tcl
+1,189
rosettacode>Ledrug
→More Clarification "set bit"
+146
rosettacode>Dgamey
→More Clarification "set bit": spacing
m−1
rosettacode>Dgamey
→More Clarification "set bit": missing key word ZERO
m+97
8 December 2011
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→Errors: Maybe the '''lwb''' and '''upb''' routines can be modelled (and renamed) to ␣␣␣/␣␣␣ to avoid confusion?
+1,696
rosettacode>Dkf
→Errors: More thoughts on this topic
+1,403
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→Errors: comparison.
+1,389
rosettacode>Dkf
→Errors: new section
+703
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→More Clarification "set bit": re: what motivates you to find ''bits'' in it... add http://nanochess.110mb.com/chess3.html#algol
+95
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→More Clarification "set bit"
+645
rosettacode>Ledrug
→More Clarification "set bit"
+151
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→More Clarification "set bit"
+200
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→Initial C code specimen requires a long int algorithm
+277
rosettacode>Ledrug
→Initial C code specimen requires a long int algorithm
+1,414
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Clarification
m+261
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→Initial C code specimen requires a long int algorithm: first left bit set, and the first right bit set?
m+267
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→Initial C code specimen requires a long int algorithm: new section
m+793
208.80.119.67
→Clarification
+258
rosettacode>NevilleDNZ
→Clarification: integers are used in the test case only toconveniently supply binary specimen for testing.
+2,492
rosettacode>Ledrug
add header; add comment
+421