Page history
Talk:Dot product
28 February 2016
Rdm
no edit summary
m+104
Hout
map-based zipWith
+72
Hout
→I suggest replacing the 'for the functional fetishists' JavaScript version
+88
27 February 2016
Hout
→I suggest replacing the 'for the functional fetishists' JavaScript version
+328
Rdm
no edit summary
+569
Hout
zipWidth and 'functional'
+946
Rdm
no edit summary
m+41
Rdm
Hmm... (second thoughts...)
m+90
Rdm
Make voices distinguishable
m+86
Rdm
→I suggest replacing the 'for the functional fetishists' JavaScript version
+753
Hout
no edit summary
+1
Hout
→I suggest replacing the 'for the functional fetishists' JavaScript version
m+6
Hout
Perhaps a more plausible version of the 'for the functional fetishists' JavaScript example
+1,784