Page history
Talk:Call a function
26 August 2011
19 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
→What is using a function in a command context?
+108
rosettacode>Dgamey
→What is using a function in a command context?
m+183
rosettacode>Markhobley
→What is using a function in a command context?
+261
rosettacode>Dgamey
→Operators
m+216
18 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
Wow! Excellent. I am looking forward to learning this.
m+123
rosettacode>TimToady
→Operators: yes, you can redefine any p6 operator in a lexical scope
+806
rosettacode>Markhobley
Hey, I found some notes entitled "Metaoperators".
m+166
rosettacode>Markhobley
if an operator is a function, can it be redefined?
+436
rosettacode>TimToady
→Operators: are truly functions in Perl 6
+1,102
17 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
Operators may be outside the scope of this task
m+520
MikeMol
I think splitting is probably more appropriate.
+353
16 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
→Huh?
mrosettacode>Markhobley
→Huh?
m+26
rosettacode>Markhobley
I don't think that we should split the task. However, we could cross reference.
+372
Rdm
→Huh?
+602
rosettacode>Dkf
→Huh?: What a mess!
+410
rosettacode>Dkf
It's a fundamental semantic difference
+439
15 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
A constant is not a function.
+320
Rdm
→Huh?
+435
rosettacode>TimToady
→Huh?: seems plain to me
+254
Rdm
→Huh?
+143
rosettacode>TimToady
→Huh?: computation isn't just about math
+299
Rdm
→Huh?
+98
Rdm
→Huh?
m+6
Rdm
→Huh?
m+9
Rdm
→Huh?
+507
rosettacode>Markhobley
:It's a larger task that shows multiple ways of calling a function ~~~~
+119
Rdm
→Huh?: new section
+779
rosettacode>Markhobley
To find out how to call a function, we really need a task that demonstrates this.
+676
rosettacode>Dgamey
duplication?
+315