Page history
Talk:Binary digits
19 January 2013
27 June 2012
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Natural numbers: added comment about '''NetRexx''' example and other stuff. -- ~~~~
+541
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Natural numbers: Concur.
+166
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Natural numbers: added comments about the zero special case. -- ~~~~
+730
9 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
→Task review process
+711
MikeMol
→Task review process: new section
+647
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→A mess?: Zero.
+470
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→A mess?: Nice and ...
+211
rosettacode>Markhobley
FWIW I have exact ideas these things
+352
rosettacode>Markhobley
Do we all agree that natural numbers are integers greater than or equal to zero?
+334
rosettacode>Ledrug
→A mess?
+949
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→A mess?: Slack.
+605
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→A mess?: Split adding new section
+13
8 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
parametric input
m+11
rosettacode>Markhobley
The task description looks fine to me.
+352
Rdm
→Has to be a dupe
+275
rosettacode>Markhobley
binary means the base two numbering system
+315
Rdm
→Has to be a dupe
m+88
Rdm
Does this make sense to you?
+560
rosettacode>Markhobley
I thought this was straightforward.
+552
rosettacode>Kernigh
Remove duplicate text from 18:18, 7 July 2011. Only want 1, not 2, copies of each comment.
−8,978
7 July 2011
rosettacode>Ledrug
no edit summary
+497
rosettacode>Markhobley
Native and Conversion
+9,213
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Has to be a dupe: Terminology clarification
+554
rosettacode>Markhobley
"Binary digits" refers specifically to the digits zero and one.
+140
Rdm
→Has to be a dupe
+685
rosettacode>Markhobley
Do not rename this task
+310
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Has to be a dupe: If that's the intent...
+481
MikeMol
→Has to be a dupe: What the intent appears to be.
+224
rosettacode>Markhobley
The ZX Spectrum solution is also specifically designed for binary
+189
rosettacode>Dkf
→Has to be a dupe: Maybe there's value
+144
98.210.210.193
no edit summary
+707
6 July 2011
Rdm
→Has to be a dupe
m−1
Rdm
→Has to be a dupe
+366
rosettacode>Markhobley
Some languages can output binary numbers natively
+118
Rdm
no edit summary
+853
rosettacode>Ledrug
no edit summary
+264
rosettacode>Markhobley
Given a decimal value n, produce its binary digits.
+208
rosettacode>Ledrug
no edit summary
+355
rosettacode>Markhobley
routines that handle several different radices are not always the best choice
+436
rosettacode>Markhobley
A brief explanation
+939
rosettacode>Ledrug
no edit summary
+291
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→Has to be a dupe: What does this add?
+605
rosettacode>Markhobley
→Has to be a dupe
+424
rosettacode>Markhobley
→Has to be a dupe
+457
rosettacode>Mwn3d
Has to be a dupe
+239