Rosetta Code:Village Pump/RC extraction Tool and Task: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(GFDL awareness)
(licensing questions)
Line 38: Line 38:
--[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 17:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
--[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 17:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
: Be aware that content on RC is GFDL licensed. Some contributors dual-license, but the deltas applied by subsequent editors may or may not be. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
: Be aware that content on RC is GFDL licensed. Some contributors dual-license, but the deltas applied by subsequent editors may or may not be. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
:: Icon/Unicon code tends to be in the public domain and major contributors are aware of that. It's all publicly declared.
::: Unicon Book (GFDL)
::: IPL code contains "this file is in public domain"
::: Unicon is public, but under what licensce I'm unsure (There was NSF funding at one point).
::: UniLib is also stated in the public domain
:: The dual license sounds awkward and unworkable. If A adds code with some other license, how can B come along and undo that?
:: Do we need to 'declare' somewhere (I was intending to) that this is going to happen.
:: --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 21:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)