Concurrent computing: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(add E examples)
(Perl)
Line 70: Line 70:
setTimeout( function(){ textbox.value += "Rosetta\n"; }, Math.random() * 1000 );
setTimeout( function(){ textbox.value += "Rosetta\n"; }, Math.random() * 1000 );
setTimeout( function(){ textbox.value += "Code\n"; }, Math.random() * 1000 );
setTimeout( function(){ textbox.value += "Code\n"; }, Math.random() * 1000 );

==[[Perl]]==
[[Category:Perl]]
use threads;
use Time::HiRes qw(sleep);
$_->join for map {
threads->create(sub {
sleep rand;
print shift, "\n";
}, $_)
} qw(Enjoy Rosetta Code);


==[[Python]]==
==[[Python]]==

Revision as of 02:11, 8 June 2007

Task
Concurrent computing
You are encouraged to solve this task according to the task description, using any language you may know.

Using either native language concurrency syntax or freely available libraries write a program to display the strings "Enjoy" "Rosetta" "Code", one string per line, in random order. Concurrency syntax must use threads, tasks, co-routines, or whatever concurrency is called in your language.


Ada

Compiler:GNAT GPL 2006

with Ada.Text_Io; use Ada.Text_Io;
with Ada.Numerics.Float_Random; use Ada.Numerics.Float_Random;
with Ada.strings.Unbounded; use Ada.Strings.Unbounded;

procedure Concurrent_Hello is
   Seed : Generator;
   
   task type Writer is 
      entry Start(Message : String);
   end Writer;
   
   task body Writer is
      Sleep_Time : Float;
      Words : Unbounded_String;
   begin
      accept Start(Message : String) do
         Words := To_Unbounded_String(Message);
      end Start;
      Sleep_Time := Random(Seed);
      delay Duration(Sleep_Time);
      Put_Line(To_String(Words));
   end Writer;
   T1 : Writer;
   T2 : Writer;
   T3 : Writer;
begin
   Reset(Seed);
   delay 0.001;
   T1.Start("Enjoy");
   T2.Start("Rosetta");
   T3.Start("Code");
end Concurrent_Hello;

E

def base := timer.now()
for string in ["Enjoy", "Rosetta", "Code"] {
    timer <- whenPast(base + entropy.nextInt(1000), fn { println(string) })
}

Nondeterminism from preemptive concurrency rather than a random number generator:

def seedVat := <import:org.erights.e.elang.interp.seedVatAuthor>(<unsafe>)
for string in ["Enjoy", "Rosetta", "Code"] {
   seedVat <- (`
       fn string {
           println(string)
           currentVat <- orderlyShutdown("done")
       }
   `) <- get(0) <- (string)
}

JavaScript

Interpreter: Firefox 2.0

var textbox = document.getElementsByTagName("textarea")[0];
setTimeout( function(){ textbox.value += "Enjoy\n";   }, Math.random() * 1000 );
setTimeout( function(){ textbox.value += "Rosetta\n"; }, Math.random() * 1000 );
setTimeout( function(){ textbox.value += "Code\n";    }, Math.random() * 1000 );

Perl

use threads;
use Time::HiRes qw(sleep);
$_->join for map {
    threads->create(sub {
        sleep rand;
        print shift, "\n";
    }, $_)
} qw(Enjoy Rosetta Code);

Python

Interpreter: Python 2.5

 import threading
 import random
 
 def echo(string):
     print string
 
 threading.Timer(random.random(), echo, ("Enjoy",)).start()
 threading.Timer(random.random(), echo, ("Rosetta",)).start()
 threading.Timer(random.random(), echo, ("Code",)).start()

Tcl

Assuming that "random" means that we really want the words to appear in random (rather then "undefined" or "arbitrary") order:

 after [expr int(1000*rand())] {puts "Enjoy"}
 after [expr int(1000*rand())] {puts "Rosetta"}
 after [expr int(1000*rand())] {puts "Code"}

will execute each line after a randomly chosen number (0...1000) of milliseconds.

A step towards "undefined" would be to use after idle, which is Tcl for "do this whenever you get around to it". Thus:

 after idle {puts "Enjoy"}
 after idle {puts "Rosetta"}
 after idle {puts "Code"}

(While no particular order is guaranteed by the Tcl spec, the currently existing interpreters would probably all execute these in the order in which they were added to the after queue).