Category talk:XBase: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Thoughts.)
(Why xBase)
Line 1: Line 1:
Is this supposed to be a language? What's the purpose for this category? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 19:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Is this supposed to be a language? What's the purpose for this category? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 19:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
: If there is no pure implementation or base common syntax, and all other languages are derivatives, it's probably just fine to have those other languages as subcategories, and treat this like one of the categories you might find in the LCT. I don't completely follow whether this page is intended to be considered a language itself. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 20:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
: If there is no pure implementation or base common syntax, and all other languages are derivatives, it's probably just fine to have those other languages as subcategories, and treat this like one of the categories you might find in the LCT. I don't completely follow whether this page is intended to be considered a language itself. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 20:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
It's here because I'm getting around to posting some solutions in Clipper/Harbour which are both xBase dialects. --[[User:Axtens|Axtens]] 03:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:14, 16 February 2010

Is this supposed to be a language? What's the purpose for this category? --Mwn3d 19:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

If there is no pure implementation or base common syntax, and all other languages are derivatives, it's probably just fine to have those other languages as subcategories, and treat this like one of the categories you might find in the LCT. I don't completely follow whether this page is intended to be considered a language itself. --Michael Mol 20:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

It's here because I'm getting around to posting some solutions in Clipper/Harbour which are both xBase dialects. --Axtens 03:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)