Anonymous user
Category talk:Recursion: Difference between revisions
Should be in the encyclopedia, but not as a subcategory
No edit summary |
(Should be in the encyclopedia, but not as a subcategory) |
||
Line 5:
I don't think that this sentence is true: <i>"The factorial example is best done with a loop."</i> I'm not editing it, though, since I don't quite know why it is there - given that one blatant counter-example (Scheme) is named right after it in the same paragraph. In some languages, the factorial might be best done with a loop, in some other languages, recursion would be the obvious (and best) approach. (In yet others, both might be equally powerful. And for all I know there's some language out there where something yet-completely-different is actually the best approach). [[User:Sgeier|Sgeier]] 16:40, 28 January 2008 (MST)
Is there a way to put the category page into the encyclopedia without making it a subcategory? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 18:50, 29 January 2008 (MST)
| |||