Category talk:Programming paradigm/Concatenative: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 14:49, 7 April 2011

What belongs in this category? For example: Should Forth be in this category? How about languages which can be used for Concatenative Programming but which allow (or even encourage) other styles of programming? --Rdm 14:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Treat it like the other programming paradigm pages. I guess we could say "if you can use this paradigm in the language and it doesn't go against the idioms of the language, it can be part of this paradigm category"? That probably deserves a vote. I'm no expert on whatever concatenative programming is, but it seems like Forth should be here based on the text on the page. --Mwn3d 14:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:24, 7 April 2011 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "What belongs in this category? For example: Should Forth be in this category? How about languages which can be used for Concatenative Programming but which allow (or even enco...")		Revision as of 14:49, 7 April 2011 (view source) rosettacode>Mwn3d (An attempt at a response) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What belongs in this category? For example: Should Forth be in this category? How about languages which can be used for Concatenative Programming but which allow (or even encourage) other styles of programming? --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] 14:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)		What belongs in this category? For example: Should Forth be in this category? How about languages which can be used for Concatenative Programming but which allow (or even encourage) other styles of programming? --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] 14:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
			:Treat it like the other programming paradigm pages. I guess we could say "if you can use this paradigm in the language and it doesn't go against the idioms of the language, it can be part of this paradigm category"? That probably deserves a vote. I'm no expert on whatever concatenative programming is, but it seems like Forth should be here based on the text on the page. --[[User:Mwn3d\|Mwn3d]] 14:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)