Category talk:Non-Programming Languages: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 09:52, 6 July 2009

What does "non-programming language" mean in this context? --Dmitry-kazakov 07:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

HTML and XML are computer languages that focus entirely on data. They are not programming languages. (Note that they can embed source code, but that's a side effect.) —Donal Fellows 08:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The primary focus of the developers isn't to produce a programming language. So sed is an editor as are vim and emacs,bc is a calculator, and m4 a macro processor. The fact that they might accomplish RC tasks doesn't mean that they should be considered as programming languages. Shades of grey. --Paddy3118 09:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

But the examples of this category are HTML, JSON, SGML, SVG and XML. Their distinguishing feature is that they are not programming languages at all; it happens that they're all data description languages (and yes, can describe or embed programs). —Donal Fellows 09:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

In what sense HTML and XML are not programming languages? Computers are programmed. Data is an input or output of a program. I cannot tell what do you mean under "focusing on data". Probably, it is just a confusion with declarative versus imperative approaches to programming. Languages using either declarative or imperative approach are still programming ones. Anyway, so long a language is a computer language it does program that computer. The text in any computer language is called program. So in what sense a computer language can be non-programming? P.S. Note that for HTML/XML, the source code is the text in HTML/XML correspondingly. Just per definition: the source code of a program is a stored text in the language the program was written. --Dmitry-kazakov 09:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

They're not programming languages because they don't give instructions. They just describe a particular pattern of data; there's no execution model. (OK, HTML is a bit of a border case if you're wanting to render it, given the blecherous mess that it has grown into.) To argue that XML is a programming language is really strange. It's just a serialization format of a node tree, and is no more a programming language than ASN.1 or S-Expressions are (though Lisp is built on top of the latter). If you're going to use a non-standard definition of “programming”, I'll not bother arguing with you. —Donal Fellows 09:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:34, 6 July 2009 (view source) rosettacode>Dmitry-kazakov (Confused with declarative?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:52, 6 July 2009 (view source) rosettacode>Dkf (that's just silly!) Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	In what sense HTML and XML are not programming languages? Computers are programmed. Data is an input or output of a program. I cannot tell what do you mean under "focusing on data". Probably, it is just a confusion with ''declarative'' versus ''imperative'' approaches to '''programming'''. Languages using either declarative or imperative approach are still programming ones. Anyway, so long a language is a '''computer''' language it does ''program'' that computer. The text in any computer language is called ''program''. So in what sense a computer language can be non-programming? P.S. Note that for HTML/XML, the source code is the text in HTML/XML correspondingly. Just per definition: the source code of a program is a stored text in the language the program was written. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov\|Dmitry-kazakov]] 09:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)		In what sense HTML and XML are not programming languages? Computers are programmed. Data is an input or output of a program. I cannot tell what do you mean under "focusing on data". Probably, it is just a confusion with ''declarative'' versus ''imperative'' approaches to '''programming'''. Languages using either declarative or imperative approach are still programming ones. Anyway, so long a language is a '''computer''' language it does ''program'' that computer. The text in any computer language is called ''program''. So in what sense a computer language can be non-programming? P.S. Note that for HTML/XML, the source code is the text in HTML/XML correspondingly. Just per definition: the source code of a program is a stored text in the language the program was written. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov\|Dmitry-kazakov]] 09:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
			: They're not programming languages because they don't give instructions. They just describe a particular pattern of data; there's no execution model. (OK, HTML is a bit of a border case if you're wanting to render it, given the blecherous mess that it has grown into.) To argue that XML is a programming language is really strange. It's just a serialization format of a node tree, and is no more a programming language than ASN.1 or S-Expressions are (though [[Lisp]] is built on top of the latter). If you're going to use a non-standard definition of “programming”, I'll not bother arguing with you. —[[User:Dkf\|Donal Fellows]] 09:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)