Category talk:Math::Complex: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Why :: instead of /?) |
(Comment.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why the double-colon? Isn't the MediaWiki syntax for subpages a slash? Besides, Math/Complex would also look better. |
Why the double-colon? Isn't the MediaWiki syntax for subpages a slash? Besides, Math/Complex would also look better. |
||
:This is the correct syntax for name of Perl modules. The name of the library is actually '''Math::Complex'''. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 11:18, 9 February 2008 (MST) |
|||
:So, i use libheader with "Math::Complex" as Perl module name. That's right. I view Math::Complex. That's right too. In category view i prefer same syntax, but only perl modules in one page ([[Perl_modules]]). Another question is URL. xxx/Math/Complex is better URL than xxx/Math::Complex. [[User:Skim|Skim]] 04:54, 12 February 2008 (MST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:54, 12 February 2008
Why the double-colon? Isn't the MediaWiki syntax for subpages a slash? Besides, Math/Complex would also look better.
- This is the correct syntax for name of Perl modules. The name of the library is actually Math::Complex. --Short Circuit 11:18, 9 February 2008 (MST)
- So, i use libheader with "Math::Complex" as Perl module name. That's right. I view Math::Complex. That's right too. In category view i prefer same syntax, but only perl modules in one page (Perl_modules). Another question is URL. xxx/Math/Complex is better URL than xxx/Math::Complex. Skim 04:54, 12 February 2008 (MST)