Category talk:Common Lisp: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Warning: known imperfect categorization...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Categorization in Language Template is Inaccurate==
==Categorization in Language Template is Inaccurate==
I've marked CL as going to machine code normally (after all, that's what the Wikipedia article claims once you sort through the confusion) though I accept that this is inaccurate for a language of CL's subtlety in this area. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I've marked CL as going to machine code normally (after all, that's what the Wikipedia article claims once you sort through the confusion) though I accept that this is inaccurate for a language of CL's subtlety in this area. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

==ECL==
[[ECL]] links to a different language, so I used a red link [[ECL (Lisp)]] at [[Read a file character by character/UTF8#Common Lisp]] to say that it works with ECL. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] ([[User talk:Kernigh|talk]]) 01:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:47, 11 June 2014

Categorization in Language Template is Inaccurate

I've marked CL as going to machine code normally (after all, that's what the Wikipedia article claims once you sort through the confusion) though I accept that this is inaccurate for a language of CL's subtlety in this area. —Donal Fellows 08:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

ECL

ECL links to a different language, so I used a red link ECL (Lisp) at Read a file character by character/UTF8#Common Lisp to say that it works with ECL. --Kernigh (talk) 01:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)