Category talk:AutoHotkey Originated: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(importance of original language)
Line 5: Line 5:


Thanks Tinku, but I was questioning the need for this because couldn't such discussions be a part of the page on Category Autohotkey? (Or that pages talk page). I remain unconvinced that this is a good idea --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 10:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Tinku, but I was questioning the need for this because couldn't such discussions be a part of the page on Category Autohotkey? (Or that pages talk page). I remain unconvinced that this is a good idea --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 10:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

: It is common for people to take note of the first language something is written in, when it has been translated widely: For example: [[wp:List_of_literary_works_by_number_of_languages_translated_into]]

Revision as of 13:27, 2 June 2009

Is This A Good Thing?

And if it is, shouldn't it be auto-generated for each task and each language? --Paddy3118 06:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

I added this category for place to discuss prior and potential autohotkey contributions to the rosettacode. The items in this category are automatically generated if you put at the bottom of a task page. You could do something similar for all the other languaes... Automating this for tasks already created would require creating a bot that can examine the history for the first lang tag... I do mean to experiment with wikibots, eventually... Tinku99 07:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Tinku, but I was questioning the need for this because couldn't such discussions be a part of the page on Category Autohotkey? (Or that pages talk page). I remain unconvinced that this is a good idea --Paddy3118 10:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

It is common for people to take note of the first language something is written in, when it has been translated widely: For example: wp:List_of_literary_works_by_number_of_languages_translated_into