User talk:Mwn3d: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary
(New section: Language implementations)
Line 4: Line 4:


WITCHCRAFT! --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 22:09, 14 November 2007 (MST)
WITCHCRAFT! --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 22:09, 14 November 2007 (MST)

== Language implementations ==

Many of the languages only have one implementation (LotusScript for example) or are themselves implementations of another language (ActionScript vs JavaScript). It would be nice for the language template to only optionally link to the category in that case. Or at least not necessarily fill in the implementation category for every language unless a specific implementation is mentioned in an example. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 21:56, 29 November 2007 (MST)

Revision as of 04:56, 30 November 2007

Welcome aboard! I founded RC, and still administer it. (Though I get a lot of help from the "bureaucrats" around here.) Check out the village pump and the "Recent Changes" RSS feed. That's how I keep up to speed. If you have any suggestions, mention it on a talk page somewhere (The Pump doesn't get as much traffic as I'd like.), and people will start chiming in. The only time I remember down a suggestion from a user, I turned out to be wrong. So don't be shy. :-) --Short Circuit 18:55, 30 October 2007 (MDT)

You probably ought to sign comments with --~~~~. That'll come out something like this: --Short Circuit 20:07, 14 November 2007 (MST)

WITCHCRAFT! --Mwn3d 22:09, 14 November 2007 (MST)

Language implementations

Many of the languages only have one implementation (LotusScript for example) or are themselves implementations of another language (ActionScript vs JavaScript). It would be nice for the language template to only optionally link to the category in that case. Or at least not necessarily fill in the implementation category for every language unless a specific implementation is mentioned in an example. --IanOsgood 21:56, 29 November 2007 (MST)