Anonymous user
User talk:LordMike: Difference between revisions
m
forced a TOC (for now).
(Move mylang stuff to user page.) |
m (forced a TOC (for now).) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
__TOC__
== Welcome ==
{{User:Short Circuit/new user greeting}} --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 18:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
== C sharp ==
We standardized on referring to C# as "C sharp". "C#" wasn't an option, because HTTP kept causing people to wind up at pages about C, and C♯ was passed over, because of limitations on convenient input for most people. For adding langueage examples, I suggest you use the syntax <nowiki>=={{header|C sharp|C#}}==</nowiki>. Sorry about the inconvenience. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 21:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
: Yea, I discovered that this morning. Will do so in the future.. :P
: --[[User:LordMike|LordMike]] 07:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
== MSSQL v. Transact-SQL ==
You're one of only two self-proclaimed Users of MSSQL on Rosetta Code. I don't use MSSQL, but I'm trying to understand Rosetta Code's structure.
<br />
<br />
[[MSSQL]] redirects to [[:Category:Transact-SQL]]. Both have "/Omit", "examples needing attention", "Implementations", and "User" pages in the Category: namespace. I'm trying to determine if all the MSSQL pages should be redirected to the equivalent Transact-SQL pages.
<br />
<br />
Can you help me understand the programmatic relationship of MSSQL and Transact-SQL? For example, does it make more sense to say the Rosetta Code Tasks are encoded in Transact-SQL?
<br />--[[User:GarveyPatrickD|GarveyPatrickD]] ([[User talk:GarveyPatrickD|talk]]) 16:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
| |||