User talk:IanOsgood: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(→‎{obscure} tag: new section)
Line 59: Line 59:


I actually like your idea of an {obscure} tag. Though some language communities may not like it, I still think it could be applied to languages whose communities don't oppose it. It could probably work like the needs-review template, but maybe with a check for languages whose communities oppose it? We may need a bot to clean up examples that have been tagged obscure when the language doesn't want to use the template. It may be too complicated to do stuff like that, but I think the idea is a good start. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 22:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
I actually like your idea of an {obscure} tag. Though some language communities may not like it, I still think it could be applied to languages whose communities don't oppose it. It could probably work like the needs-review template, but maybe with a check for languages whose communities oppose it? We may need a bot to clean up examples that have been tagged obscure when the language doesn't want to use the template. It may be too complicated to do stuff like that, but I think the idea is a good start. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 22:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Maybe {please-explain} would be more constructive? The tag would be an invitation to explain the code further. The person taking up the invitation might add a few comments to the code, or a full explanation on a separate page (Talk or sub-page). --[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 22:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)