User talk:Hout: Revision history

18 March 2021

• curprev 17:3217:32, 18 March 2021‎ Hout talk contribs‎ empty −3,056‎ →‎This can be discussed on the Padovans page
• curprev 17:2117:21, 18 March 2021‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,056 bytes +3,056‎ Undo revision 327287 by Hout (talk) I would suggest you not try and bury a real issue.
• curprev 17:0617:06, 18 March 2021‎ Hout talk contribs‎ empty −3,056‎ →‎When is "fully linted" not idiomatic: I don't know who he thinks I am. But his problems clearly come from elsewhere.
• curprev 15:5215:52, 18 March 2021‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,056 bytes +1,283‎ →‎When is "fully linted" not idiomatic: Fooling a linter means only that.
• curprev 10:2710:27, 18 March 2021‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 1,773 bytes +927‎ →‎The only comment which provides constrastive insight is an alternative draft.
• curprev 09:5409:54, 18 March 2021‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 846 bytes +846‎ →‎When is "fully linted" not idiomatic

11 March 2020

• curprev 15:4815:48, 11 March 2020‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m empty −50,530‎ // Spring cleaning.

4 February 2020

• curprev 23:4223:42, 4 February 2020‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 50,530 bytes +858‎ →‎Enuf already - no need to shout.
• curprev 17:5817:58, 4 February 2020‎ rosettacode>Dick de Bill‎ 49,672 bytes +1,020‎ →‎None Pythonic code: comment
• curprev 13:1713:17, 4 February 2020‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 48,652 bytes +5‎ →‎None Pythonic code
• curprev 13:0313:03, 4 February 2020‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 48,647 bytes +1,061‎ →‎All Pylinted - no more to say
• curprev 12:1312:13, 4 February 2020‎ rosettacode>Dick de Bill‎ 47,586 bytes +102‎ →‎None Pythonic code: fixed formatting
• curprev 12:1112:11, 4 February 2020‎ rosettacode>Dick de Bill‎ 47,484 bytes +548‎ →‎None Pythonic code: comment

10 March 2019

• curprev 18:2118:21, 10 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 46,936 bytes +141‎ →‎'Non Pythonic' code: (a preoccupation with dress code at the expense of capacity would hardly be a sign of good health ...)

8 March 2019

• curprev 09:4509:45, 8 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 46,795 bytes +194‎ You mean Hindley-Milner ? (Not Miller, and not a coding style). Just a type system underlying the rough notation in my comments.
• curprev 09:3809:38, 8 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 46,601 bytes −9‎ →‎Would RC really carry much weight as the sword-bearing last defence of sacred stylistic flames ?
• curprev 09:3509:35, 8 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 46,610 bytes +1,338‎ →‎Would RC carry much weight as a sword-bearing defender of sacred stylistic flames ? Probably not ...
• curprev 07:3307:33, 8 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 45,272 bytes +115‎ →‎None Pythonic code: What '''is''' this angry, destructive, and fantastical obsession ? Do you have someone with whom you could talk about it ?
• curprev 07:2607:26, 8 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 45,157 bytes +2,772‎ →‎Non-Pythonic code: What '''is''' this angry, destructive, and fantastical obsession ? Do you have someone with whom you could talk about it ?
• curprev 04:2504:25, 8 March 2019‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 42,385 bytes +2,175‎ →‎None Pythonic code: comment
• curprev 01:5901:59, 8 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 40,210 bytes +128‎ →‎None Pythonic code
• curprev 01:5701:57, 8 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 40,082 bytes +1,448‎ Do stop this childish campaign of harassment - give yourself a break
• curprev 01:5701:57, 8 March 2019‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 38,634 bytes +1,163‎ →‎None Pythonic code: Response to further evasion.
• curprev 01:1901:19, 8 March 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 37,471 bytes +547‎ →‎None Pythonic code

7 March 2019

• curprev 23:4623:46, 7 March 2019‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 36,924 bytes +1,187‎ →‎None Pythonic code

2 February 2019

• curprev 15:2415:24, 2 February 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m 35,737 bytes −1‎ →‎def is too sweet
• curprev 15:2415:24, 2 February 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 35,738 bytes +262‎ →‎def is too sweet: indeed. It is.
• curprev 14:2014:20, 2 February 2019‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 35,476 bytes +446‎ →‎def is too sweet: Absolutely agree - simply deference to the culture of the PEP linters
• curprev 12:5512:55, 2 February 2019‎ Nigel Galloway talk contribs‎ 35,030 bytes +445‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python: def is too sweet

28 October 2018

• curprev 17:2717:27, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m 34,585 bytes +15‎ No edit summary
• curprev 17:1917:19, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 34,570 bytes +2‎ Donald, that is more than enough now, and is not constructive. Please stop.
• curprev 17:1617:16, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m 34,568 bytes +53‎ Enough.
• curprev 17:1117:11, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 34,515 bytes +1,848‎ Enough now. Please stop. It is not up to you, or your dictionary, to determine whether I feel harassed. I do.
• curprev 16:1316:13, 28 October 2018‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 32,667 bytes +3,621‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python: Comments on the reply.
• curprev 14:2914:29, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m 29,046 bytes +60‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 14:1814:18, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 28,986 bytes 0‎ No edit summary
• curprev 14:1514:15, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m 28,986 bytes −5‎ No edit summary
• curprev 14:1414:14, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 28,991 bytes +82‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 14:1214:12, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 28,909 bytes +809‎ Python itself is not Pythonic (that failed to get through the PEP processes), but set comprehensions are excellent.
• curprev 13:5813:58, 28 October 2018‎ Nigel Galloway talk contribs‎ 28,100 bytes +1,358‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 13:3813:38, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 26,742 bytes −2‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 13:0613:06, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 26,744 bytes 0‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 13:0213:02, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 26,744 bytes +620‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 12:5312:53, 28 October 2018‎ Thundergnat talk contribs‎ 26,124 bytes +452‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python: No true Scotsman
• curprev 12:3612:36, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 25,672 bytes +36‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 12:3512:35, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 25,636 bytes +3‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 12:3412:34, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 25,633 bytes +323‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python
• curprev 12:0812:08, 28 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 25,310 bytes +5,502‎ →‎Functional Python and pythonic Python: The spirit of Rosetta is to be inspired more by what is shared than by what is different.
• curprev 10:4510:45, 28 October 2018‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 19,808 bytes +1,786‎ →‎Pythonic code

22 November 2016

• curprev 22:0922:09, 22 November 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,022 bytes +229‎ →‎Faulhaber's formula#Python
• curprev 22:0622:06, 22 November 2016‎ rosettacode>Arbautjc‎ 17,793 bytes +389‎ →‎Faulhaber's formula#Python: new section

7 November 2016

• curprev 16:3016:30, 7 November 2016‎ rosettacode>Arbautjc‎ 17,404 bytes +1,645‎ →‎Two formulae invisible in the GAP contribution on Machin-like formulas: new section
• curprev 12:4012:40, 7 November 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 15,759 bytes −2,899‎ →‎Repairing lost visibility of formula elements

15 October 2016

• curprev 12:0012:00, 15 October 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,658 bytes +187‎ Thanks ! - Added your repairs to the active list at ...
• curprev 09:4609:46, 15 October 2016‎ WillNess talk contribs‎ 18,471 bytes +58‎ →‎Update
• curprev 09:3909:39, 15 October 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,413 bytes +89‎ →‎Update: Thanks !
• curprev 09:3709:37, 15 October 2016‎ WillNess talk contribs‎ 18,324 bytes +406‎ →‎Update: mark few (well, 2 for now) edits that I've made to fix the math visibility; I'm on Chrome/Win7Pro-SP1 and I had this problem too

24 September 2016

• curprev 20:4920:49, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 17,918 bytes 0‎ →‎Repairing lost visibility of formula elements
• curprev 20:0620:06, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 17,918 bytes −60‎ →‎Repairing lost visibility of formula elements
• curprev 19:4419:44, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 17,978 bytes +5‎ Normalized the subset of http links to https, and sorted all links to still unrepaired tasks (A-Z)
• curprev 18:2318:23, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m 17,973 bytes +2‎ No edit summary
• curprev 18:2218:22, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 17,971 bytes +68‎ Updated lists of tasks that are still in need of repair (visibility and <math> tag issues)
• curprev 13:5313:53, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 17,903 bytes −52‎ →‎Update
• curprev 13:1713:17, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 17,955 bytes −1,462‎ Updated list of 57 tasks in which formulae have been accidentally made invisible
• curprev 11:0311:03, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 19,417 bytes +820‎ Some tasks flagged as now repaired
• curprev 10:5410:54, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,597 bytes −52‎ →‎Update
• curprev 10:4510:45, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,649 bytes +76‎ →‎Update
• curprev 10:4510:45, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,573 bytes +181‎ A note in each task discussion page gives the date & time of the under-tested edit
• curprev 10:2310:23, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,392 bytes +1‎ bond percolation fixed - (not comb sort)
• curprev 10:2010:20, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,391 bytes +86‎ →‎Update
• curprev 09:5109:51, 24 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 18,305 bytes +3,960‎ List of 69 damaged tasks still in need of repair (formulae accidentally made invisible - mostly during recent cosmetic edits)

22 September 2016

• curprev 22:2822:28, 22 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 14,345 bytes +75‎ →‎Repairing lost visibility of formula elements
• curprev 22:2422:24, 22 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 14,270 bytes +4‎ Repairing lost visibility of formula elements
• curprev 22:2222:22, 22 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 14,266 bytes +1,620‎ Others welcome to carry out repairs on invisible formulae in task descriptions

23 October 2015

• curprev 13:2613:26, 23 October 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 12,646 bytes −284‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:2513:25, 23 October 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 12,930 bytes +285‎ No edit summary

8 September 2015

• curprev 09:0409:04, 8 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 12,645 bytes +899‎ (accidental edit in second browser tab)
• curprev 09:0309:03, 8 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 11,746 bytes −899‎ No edit summary
• curprev 09:0009:00, 8 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m 12,645 bytes +1‎ No edit summary
• curprev 08:5908:59, 8 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 12,644 bytes +2,175‎ No need to drift into this territory: http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/386:_Duty_Calls :-)
• curprev 07:5907:59, 8 September 2015‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 10,469 bytes +812‎ Clarification of my view.
• curprev 07:3407:34, 8 September 2015‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 9,657 bytes +262‎ No edit summary
• curprev 07:1607:16, 8 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 9,395 bytes +2,016‎ Attempting to redefine tasks as exclusive syntactic sugar-tasting parties risks diminishing the value of the site.
• curprev 06:2806:28, 8 September 2015‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 7,379 bytes +1,431‎ Javascripts own standards body says what is a comprehension - why contradict them?

7 September 2015

• curprev 23:2523:25, 7 September 2015‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ m 5,948 bytes +317‎ middle ground?
• curprev 23:0723:07, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 5,631 bytes −1‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:2922:29, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 5,632 bytes −1‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:0022:00, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 5,633 bytes +17‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:0022:00, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 5,616 bytes +1,296‎ No edit summary
• curprev 21:4121:41, 7 September 2015‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ m 4,320 bytes +3‎ whoops.
• curprev 21:4021:40, 7 September 2015‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 4,317 bytes +577‎ Not there yet...
• curprev 21:1521:15, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 3,740 bytes +450‎ This needs wider discussion. You were advised to restrict yourself to targets which used for loop. This is not one of those targets.
• curprev 21:0821:08, 7 September 2015‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,290 bytes +482‎ isomorphic? Grand, but is it a list comprehension?
• curprev 20:4020:40, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ m 2,808 bytes +1‎ No edit summary
• curprev 20:3920:39, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 2,807 bytes +55‎ No edit summary
• curprev 20:3620:36, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 2,752 bytes +1,475‎ If the 2nd JavaScript were to be censored, the Mathematica example (and 1st JavaScript example) would have to go too. Adding value ? or reducing it ?
• curprev 20:1620:16, 7 September 2015‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 1,277 bytes +477‎ Check wikipedia?
• curprev 18:2918:29, 7 September 2015‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 800 bytes +800‎ Matches all three criteria, and arguably to a higher degree than the example which has been left in place.