User talk:Bbsingapore: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 22:31, 22 December 2011

Hi, when you do an edit could you please fill the "Summary:" field accordingly? Because currenlty you leave this field filled with the header of another programming language name which is not relevant. When I see an edit about OCaml, I go to see this edit, but your edits was about "Mathematica". Blue Prawn 17:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Don't be too hard on him; it's easy to forget. (It irritates me every time. Just a little irritation, but even so.) It would be nice if in the future it was remembered, at least most of the time… –Donal Fellows 22:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:04, 22 December 2011 (view source) rosettacode>Blue Prawn mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:31, 22 December 2011 (view source) rosettacode>Dkf (It's how the software works…) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hi, when you do an edit could you please fill the "Summary:" field accordingly? Because currenlty you leave this field filled with the header of another programming language name which is not relevant. When I see an edit about OCaml, I go to see this edit, but your edits was about "Mathematica". [[User:Blue Prawn\|Blue Prawn]] 17:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)		Hi, when you do an edit could you please fill the "Summary:" field accordingly? Because currenlty you leave this field filled with the header of another programming language name which is not relevant. When I see an edit about OCaml, I go to see this edit, but your edits was about "Mathematica". [[User:Blue Prawn\|Blue Prawn]] 17:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
			: Don't be too hard on him; it's easy to forget. (It irritates me every time. Just a little irritation, but even so.) It would be nice if in the future it was remembered, at least ''most'' of the time… –[[User:Dkf\|Donal Fellows]] 22:31, 22 December 2011 (UTC)