Talk:Verhoeff algorithm: Difference between revisions
→Omitted algorithm
m (→Omitted algorithm: is my 'y' key stuck? or is this an autocorrect issue? second type 'lengthy' has been 'length') |
|||
Line 13:
::::And, I myself have not written that lengthy description. But it's still possible, and a good idea. And, omitting it is bad practice. Maybe someone else will step up here? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 18:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
:::::Well, if anyone thinks they can improve on the clarity of the Wikipedia article, they're welcome to try. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
::"lengthy and needless repetition..." I resemble that remark. I usually try to err on the side of too much information rather than not enough. Not 100% of the time but pretty darn often. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 11:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
| |||