Talk:Set consolidation: Difference between revisions
→Sets of Sets: new section
(→Why.: Cool, a recursive version!) |
(→Sets of Sets: new section) |
||
Line 24:
:::: Cool a recursive version. Maybe you could add it as a second Python implementation? Maybe I need to add that you should return your input when asked to consolidate less than two sets; as you have done. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 10:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
== Sets of Sets ==
This task specifies an intermediate result which can be a set or which can be a set of sets. But this can become ambiguous if the input is a set of sets of sets. I think it would be better if the task stuck with one level of abstraction for intermediate results (if arguments and all intermediate results were a set of sets). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 22:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
| |||