Anonymous user
Talk:SEDOLs: Difference between revisions
TCL: fails to reject the use of '_' in a SEDOL.
(New section: '0' checksum) |
(TCL: fails to reject the use of '_' in a SEDOL.) |
||
Line 16:
Among the test strings ought to be one that requires a '0' to verify that the checksum is in the range 0..9 instead of 1..10. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 00:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
== TCL and _ ==
Hi, I generally like the use of '_' in the TCL solutio, but on checking, I find that it fails to reject the use of '_' in a SEDOL:
<lang tcl>(bin) 11 % set code B0YBKT
B0YBKT
(bin) 12 % set sedol "${code}[sedol::checksum $code]"
B0YBKT7
(bin) 13 % set code B0YBAT
B0YBAT
(bin) 14 % set sedol "${code}[sedol::checksum $code]"
invalid character: A
(bin) 15 % set code B0YB_T
B0YB_T
(bin) 16 % set sedol "${code}[sedol::checksum $code]"
B0YB_T7
(bin) 17 % </lang>
--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
| |||