Talk:Range modifications

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 22:32, 23 October 2020 by Petelomax (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 314533 by Petelomax (talk))

Consistent with the goals of Rosetta Code ?

These formulations are charmingly Procustean and intemperate:

  1. "Solutions must work by XYZ ..."
  2. "Do not use algorithms that XYZ ..."


but I do wonder how much they really contribute to the aim of Rosetta Code, expressed on the landing page: "to aid a person with a grounding in one approach to a problem in learning another" ?

They seem a little anxious not to be exposed to alternative solutions to a given problem :-) Hout (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

I must admit I was slightly taken aback by imm. slapping Wren got for "[ ]", esp. as the task does not specify output.
Another concern is whether modified ranges should be held as a string, or something more native/useable. --Pete Lomax (talk) 22:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)