Talk:Range expansion: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 04:59, 17 July 2010

Negative ranges

Should the test case contain a negative range, such as -15--10? Stormneedle 18:57, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

It was carefully chosen to have a negative number as I found it complicated the Python solution I was working on. Self flagellationarily yours, --Paddy3118 19:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I think he was asking if the test case should be extended to include a range where the terminating number is negative. For example, perhaps -3--1 instead of -3-1? --Rdm 19:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I was, Rdm. Sorry that I was unclear. Stormneedle 21:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Ahh. I understand now. Yes. I'll make the change within the hour, but it will invalidate all current entries. (How do you flag all entries for update due to a change in the task? --Paddy3118 04:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:35, 16 July 2010 (view source) rosettacode>Stormneedle (→‎Negative ranges) ← Older edit		Revision as of 04:59, 17 July 2010 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎Negative ranges) Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::: Yes, I was, Rdm. Sorry that I was unclear. [[User:Stormneedle\|Stormneedle]] 21:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		::: Yes, I was, Rdm. Sorry that I was unclear. [[User:Stormneedle\|Stormneedle]] 21:35, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

			: Ahh. I understand now. Yes. I'll make the change within the hour, but it will invalidate all current entries. (How do you flag all entries for update due to a change in the task? --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 04:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)