Talk:Range expansion: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 19:21, 16 July 2010

Negative ranges

Should the test case contain a negative range, such as -15--10? Stormneedle 18:57, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

It was carefully chosen to have a negative number as I found it complicated the Python solution I was working on. Self flagellationarily yours, --Paddy3118 19:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I think he was asking if the test case should be extended to include a range where the terminating number is negative. For example, perhaps -3--1 instead of -3-1? --Rdm 19:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:17, 16 July 2010 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎Negative ranges: Yep!) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:21, 16 July 2010 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) (→‎Negative ranges) Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	: It was carefully chosen to have a negative number as I found it complicated the Python solution I was working on. Self flagellationarily yours, --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 19:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)		: It was carefully chosen to have a negative number as I found it complicated the Python solution I was working on. Self flagellationarily yours, --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 19:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

			:: I think he was asking if the test case should be extended to include a range where the terminating number is negative. For example, perhaps -3--1 instead of -3-1? --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] 19:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)