Talk:Prime triangle: Difference between revisions
m
this change has been made, and my attribution comment would now be mostly noise
m (this change has been made, and my attribution comment would now be mostly noise) |
|||
Line 4:
: Yes. ... I can get a 30% speedup on the C implementation by changing <tt>for (size_t i = 1; i + 1 != length; ++i) {</tt> to <tt>for (size_t i = 1; i + 1 < length; i+= 2) {</tt>.
: But I am leaving that alone for now -- this little laptop I am working on is so slow that the timings I would report would look like a significant slowdown even after that speedup (for me it's 1.64 seconds down to 1.25 seconds, and the code reports how long it takes to run). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 15:55, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
::Does seem to give a worthwhile performance boost, thanks Nigel - I've adjusted the VB.NET and Algol 68 samples accordingly. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 18:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
| |||