Talk:Perfect shuffle: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(added a comment + a question.) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: I did elide most of it, but why shouldn't this be a part of the task requirements? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 20:07, 15 June 2015 (UTC) |
:: I did elide most of it, but why shouldn't this be a part of the task requirements? --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 20:07, 15 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
::: If everybody (hopefully) will be eliding the output (to something reasonable), why have the Rosetta Code task ask for 10,000 shuffles? Why not just ask for twenty shuffles (up to a deck size of forty)?. That would make outputs somewhat homogenized. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:15, 15 June 2015
Hostile task requirement?
When I try to post the result specified by this task, I get a message that the website is offline. Perhaps this is because that result is a 21010 character long line of text. But something similar happens when I try to post the result as a table with 53 lines of 253 characters. Perhaps the task should be changed to not require such a large result? --Rdm (talk) 17:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- If everybody (hopefully) will be eliding the output (to something reasonable), why have the Rosetta Code task ask for 10,000 shuffles? Why not just ask for twenty shuffles (up to a deck size of forty)?. That would make outputs somewhat homogenized. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 20:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)