Anonymous user
Talk:Numerical integration: Difference between revisions
→missing or incomplete output(s): added a new talk section.
(→missing or incomplete output(s): added a new talk section.) |
|||
Line 31:
Computation time didn't bother me, but I think the choice of n being up in the millions causes multiple digits of precision to be lost in accumulated representation error. The result is that differences between methods are obscured by the common effect of accumulated representation error. I agree, 32 would be a fine number. So would 4, or 10, or even 1000. —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 22:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
== missing or incomplete output(s) ==
Has anyone else noticed that almost '''1/2''' of the programming examples don't have any output or have an incomplete output? (Output should have twenty results). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
| |||