Talk:Matrix with two diagonals: Difference between revisions
m
(I am reverting this, again, because our anonymous friend calls history "urban legend" See also cve-2010-0517, CVE-2011-0217, https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/862, etc.) The politics might matter, but not while ignoring history.
m (removed anonymous comment which apparently claimed that https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2004-0200/ did not happen.) |
m ((I am reverting this, again, because our anonymous friend calls history "urban legend" See also cve-2010-0517, CVE-2011-0217, https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/862, etc.) The politics might matter, but not while ignoring history.) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 5:
JPEGs are susceptible to exploits, and it seems a pity to risk the impression of obliging others to
do something which is potentially insecure.
(My advice to others would be: never click on a direct JPEG link offered by an unknown host). [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 09:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Line 15 ⟶ 14:
:: I wonder if there isn't a line that needs to be drawn at the point where the quality of task descriptions declines so far that they are not even secure (let alone adequate). [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
::
:: '''Suggestion 1'''. Delete that link to a JPEG. Some of
:: '''Suggestion 2'''. Replace the JPEG link with a textual matrix and an adequate description. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 11:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
| |||