Talk:Lychrel numbers: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 17:59, 31 August 2015 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎simpler wording: Simpler?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:01, 31 August 2015 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) (→‎simpler wording) Newer edit →
Line 58:		Line 58:

	:Isn't it the case that while the latter may be technically correct and less wordy, the former states more explicitly the omission of zero? I tend to want to keep the former. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 17:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)		:Isn't it the case that while the latter may be technically correct and less wordy, the former states more explicitly the omission of zero? I tend to want to keep the former. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 17:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

			:: Why is this even an issue? Regardless of whether or not 0 is tested, 0 is not a Lychrel number because 0+0 = 0 and 0 is a palindrome. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 18:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)