Talk:Literals/Floating point: Difference between revisions
m (→REXX: added comment about the firth argument (being zero) for the FORMAT bif. -- ~~~~) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) m (→REXX) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 19:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC) |
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 19:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
:I didn't say that, did I? ooRexx returns 3.0 for this!--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 20:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:33, 27 August 2012
Fortran
I'm amazed that there is not a Fortran example for this yet. Since the ISO 1990 (1991?) standard (commonly called Fortran 90), Fortran has had some of the richest language-based (not library-dependent) floating point support around. ISO 2003 adds specific optional support for IEEE numbers too IIRC. I'll try to put together an example if I can find the time, but I no longer have access to a current Fortran compiler. --Balrog 09:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
REXX
not quite?
something=3; format(something,,,,0) yields '3' (on ooRexx) --Walterpachl 18:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I adjusted the explanation for the "rule" for the FORMAT bif for the fifth argument being zero.
Note that if
<lang rexx>something = 3.0
say format(something,,,,0)</lang>should return
3.0
not
3
-- Gerard Schildberger 19:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't say that, did I? ooRexx returns 3.0 for this!--Walterpachl 20:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)