Talk:Literals/Floating point: Revision history

28 August 2012

• curprev 17:4917:49, 28 August 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 3,418 bytes +237‎ →‎REXX: added explanation of an edit not effected. -- ~~~~
• curprev 17:3917:39, 28 August 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 3,181 bytes +180‎ →‎REXX: no exponential notation when exponent would be 0
• curprev 16:3416:34, 28 August 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 3,001 bytes +777‎ →‎REXX: reiterated what format(3.0,,,,0) returns. -- ~~~~
• curprev 11:3511:35, 28 August 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 2,224 bytes +173‎ →‎REXX: REXX/TSO does not switch to exponential notation either
• curprev 06:0506:05, 28 August 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 2,051 bytes −1‎ →‎REXX: typo
• curprev 06:0406:04, 28 August 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 2,052 bytes +328‎ →‎REXX: another difference that evolved over time?

27 August 2012

• curprev 20:4120:41, 27 August 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 1,724 bytes +657‎ →‎REXX: clarified who did what. -- ~~~~
• curprev 20:3320:33, 27 August 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 1,067 bytes +119‎ →‎REXX
• curprev 19:2719:27, 27 August 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 948 bytes +318‎ →‎REXX: added comment about the firth argument (being zero) for the FORMAT bif. -- ~~~~
• curprev 18:2918:29, 27 August 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ m 630 bytes +26‎ add something=3 & ooRexx
• curprev 18:2718:27, 27 August 2012‎ Walterpachl talk contribs‎ 604 bytes +121‎ →‎REXX: new section

5 March 2011

• curprev 09:1909:19, 5 March 2011‎ rosettacode>Balrog‎ 483 bytes +483‎ Created page with "== Fortran == I'm amazed that there is not a Fortran example for this yet. Since the ISO 1990 (1991?) standard (commonly called Fortran 90), Fortran has had some of the richest l..."